Hi Josh,
Glad to field some questions
1. Question: I am interested in who ultimately has control of the content of a corporate film and how that relates to whether these films are documetary or propaganda (not a negative term per se).
A: In my own situation, believe it or not, I have much control of the film. Ultimately, of course, the client has control. But I discover, create and promote the message as authentically as possible from the voices in the story.
It's funny...I deeply connect with the "heroes" of the film and don't think too much about the organization at large. My storytelling is driven by people who are passionate about what they do and how they are making the world a better place to live. I use the 'documentary' approach as I feel it most closely touches and captures the heart of the people I'm trying to portray. That is the bottom line for me. Plus, I've been raised in the documentary world, so I'm partial to that sytle. Of course, Errol Morris might have a different opinion
Is it propaganda? I've addressed this before in other interviews: everything, to one degree or another, is propaganda (IMHO.) Think about it. We're all selling or promoting something to someone somewhere. Call it what you will. If a product or service is designed to help humans evolve to a higher level of consciousness, then my goal is to capture that to best degree I can, given all the parameters I face.
2. Question: Does the filmmaker have ultimate control of the content of the final film?
A: I do not have ultimate control of the film, the client does. I must say I have been blessed with fantastic clients who have given me almost complete reign to create something for them. Once in a while, I have to adjust something, but clients want an authentic film so most of my material that I think should be in it makes it in.
3. Questions: When a filmmaker takes a job is the focus on producing a piece that meets the goals of the corporation only?
A: Good question. The answer is no. I'm producing a film now that is designed to effect a single viewer when they watch it...it's a deal-breaker for them.
4. If it is about how employees feel about some part of the company, does the director have to provide a represenative selection of views or are they supposed to portray the view the corporation wants only?
When I can, I try to get a sampling of views, so it's not one-sided or the views convey a diversity of thoughts. I'm big on diversity on every level. It's not a perfect world, and a filmmaker needs to recognize that...but it's good to keep the "higher intentions" in mind.
Hope this helps a bit

Thanks for the questions.
Thomas Clifford
http://www.directortom.com